The implications of COVID 19 on the publication of library and information science literature in Africa: A bibliometric study

Main Article Content

Andrew Ojulong
Rhoda Diyoshak
Constant Okello-Obura

Abstract

In almost a blink of an eye COVID 19 pandemic has surprised the world with devastating effects witnessed across the globe. There was urgent need to establish whether COVID 19 has taken hold of the publishing industry based on the unprecedented pandemic situation in the modern world. The study employed desk review alongside citation and bibliographic analysis to carry out inquiry into the publications in Library and Information Science as a case covering the period 2017 to 2020 and looking at the top 10 publishing countries in Africa. There was need to ascertain the hypothesis that COVID 19 pandemic could have affected the publication trends of literature with consideration of the trajectories before and at present. Findings suggest that research output increased during COVID 19 period with Nigeria and South Africa taking the lead in publications respectively while South Africa had the highest impact factor. Uganda, and Algeria remained extremely low with disparity between countries in terms of the number of publications wider as evidenced by the higher standard deviation of 100.9.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ojulong, A., Rhoda Diyoshak, & Constant Okello-Obura. (2022). The implications of COVID 19 on the publication of library and information science literature in Africa: A bibliometric study. Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Journal, 3(2), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.54480/slrm.v3i2.56
Section
Articles

References

Ali, P.M., Malik, B.A., and Raza, A. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of literature on knowledge sharing. Annals of Library and Information Studies. 65. 217-227

Baghestanian, S., & Popov, S. V. (2018). On publication, refereeing and working hard. Canadian Journal of Economics, 51(4), 1419–1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12352

Diego, I. M. De, González-fernández, C., Fernández-isabel, A., Fernández, R. R., & Cabezas, J. (2021). System for evaluating the reliability and novelty of medical scientific papers. 15(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101188

Kumar, M. (2014) Library Herald Journal: A Bibliometric Study. Journal of Education & Social Policy. 1(2), 1-4

Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2021). Disruption indices and their calculation using web-of-science data : Indicators of historical developments or evolutionary dynamics ? Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101219

Montero-Díaz, M. et al. (2018) A Science Mapping Analysis of'Communication'WoS Subject Category (1980-2013)." Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal. 26/55, 81- 91 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-08

Okuzaki, Y., Nakamura, S., & Nakaoka, M. (2019). Toward more rapid and efficient peer review: A case study on publication in Ecological Research. Ecological Research, 34(5), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12037

Qiu, H., Chen, Y.F. (2009). Bibliometric analysis of biological invasions research during the period of 1991 to 2007. Scientometrics 81, Pp.601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2207-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2207-4

Ravichandran, M., Sivaprasad,. & Manoharan, K. (2014) Bibliometric Citations in PH.D. Theses in Library and Information Science at Bharathidasan University, Tiruchi. International Journal of Digital Library Services. 4(3). 2-4

Skoie, H. (1999) Bibliometric—some warnings from the north. Scientometrics 45, 433–437 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457603

Yuh‐ Shan, H. and James, H. (2016) "Classic articles in psychology in the Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis." British Journal of Psychology, 107(4), 768- 780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12163